Peace and Good Things

The much anticipated peace banquet, at which Town, Village, PDDG, and media representatives gathered on April 30 to begin to strengthen ties frayed by the Newman Development Group’s controversial proposal to build a big box Lowe’s was a lovely affair. A multi-course Italian-themed meal, sumptuous desserts, fine wine, and good conversation in the beautiful setting of Sweet Briar made for a pleasant evening.

The peace the evening was intended to usher in, or at least hasten, appears to have lasted no longer than the next day. In a letter to me dated May 2, Geneseo Town Supervisor Wes Kennison went well out of his way and well outside of a fair reading of the law to challenge my use of the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) to obtain Town records related to Newman’s proposal.

In March, I had filed a request for 12 documents referenced in the billing records of the Town’s attorneys, Underberg and Kessler, but which I had overlooked in my first FOIL request, filed in October 2006. On March 16, the always helpful Town Clerk, Jean Bennett, informed me that the Town had received my request and would respond within 20 business days. Twenty business days later, on April 13, I received four documents and nothing else, no letter of explanation as to the status of the other records and no information as to when I might expect a response.

On April 16, I asked Jean whether I might expect any further response. She indicated she did not know. I asked again on April 17 and received the same response, so I filed an appeal with the Town requesting access to the records. That is exactly the process specified by the state Freedom of Information Law: the subject of a FOIL request has 5 days to acknowledge receipt of a request and 20 more days to provide the records or an explanation of where they are and when they will be provided. Failure to do so constitutes a denial of the record, the response to which is an appeal.

Geneseo Town Law is actually more restrictive. It states, and I quote directly,
“If the Town does not provide or deny access to the record sought within five business days of receipt of a request, the Town agency shall furnish a written acknowledgment of receipt of the request for the record and a statement of the approximate date when the request will be granted or denied. If access to records is neither granted nor denied within 10 business days after the date of acknowledgment of receipt of a request, the request may be construed as a denial of access that may be appealed.”

Despite these apparently clear standards, Supervisor Kennison responded to my appeal with an attack on my actions and my motives. He wrote: “You chose to interpret the Town’s actions as a ‘denial’ of your request, and filed this appeal within a matter of days. Your repetitious FOIL requests and appeals are burdening the Town and diverting Town personnel from more important tasks.”

Continuing, and getting more and more agitated, Kennison wrote, “Your conduct constitutes abuse of a process intended to ensure our system of open government. For the FOIL system to work requires a commitment on the part of Town officials and responsible use of the FOIL process by citizens. Barrages of FOIL requests simply for the sake of harassing the Town were never part of the Legislature’s intentions….Your FOIL request was not denied and this appeal was unnecessary.”

I am not seeking to harass or barrage Town officials. I am attempting to obtain documents which are known to have been produced and which are subject to public disclosure under FOIL. Any hardship in obtaining these records is solely a product of Town recordkeeping and record retention protocols. You can draw your own conclusions about why the Supervisor is so upset with me.

I acted precisely as prescribed by state law and with more generosity than is required by Town law. My generosity was rewarded with an abusive and flatly wrong response from the Supervisor.


7 responses to “Peace and Good Things

  1. Hey Bill,

    Thanks for sharing the latest from Wes. I don’t know if his response to PDDG’S FOIL request could be any more ridiculous. The FOIL’s you’ve shown me haven’t been “barrages ” at all, but carefully targeted and polite requests for imporant public documents. And, like you’ve said, the whole issue would be over if Wes would just ask his buddies at Newman to provide their copies of the documents.

    Isn’t it true that Wes has never even acknowledged or responded to this simple solution to the whole controversy?

    This really makes me wonder what he is hiding. What is it that he doesn’t want the public to know?

    Peace and good things indeed.


  2. Why is it that every time someone takes issue or disagrees with you it is an “attack”. In reading many of your previous online columns, everything is an attack. You say you welcome disagreement and challenges but you always respond back that it is a personal attack or an attack to your character. You can dish it but…..

  3. So the mysterious Mr. Lamb resurfaces! Welcome to our blog! Bill and I are familiar with Mr. Lamb’s writings as he has sent a series of letters to the editor to The Lamron.
    You can read some of that history in one of Bill’s previous columns published in the Clarion on March 8, 2007 and available online at:
    Mr. Lamb has continued to refuse both Bill and my requests to identify himself and state his interest in Geneseo. We have our suspicions, but since we have decided to allow anonymous posts on this site, I approved his comments. Still, we remain curious, so if anyone knows who Mr. Lamb really is, please let us know!

  4. Dear Mr Lamb,

    Wes accuses Bill of sending a “barrage” of FOIL requests “simply for the sake of harrassing the Town,” and you don’t see that as a personal attack?


    Jim Allen

  5. Lizz Savaard

    A person with character stands up and voices his/her opinion clearly and accepts responsibility for its content. It is a shame that someone as small-minded and lacking in integrity as Mr. Lamb warrants so much attention.

    Lizz Savard

  6. Lizz Savard

    Now that really IS a personal attack. But, that’s OK. And, by the way, I simply voiced an opinion in the Lamron and I certainly did not ask for all this attention.
    On another note, thank you Mr. Strong for welcoming me to your blog. I enjoy reading your and Dr. Bill’s comments. While I don’t always agree, and sometimes find the points humerous, I do enjoying reading them. But then again I am small minded !!

  7. Phillip J. Bracchi

    Mr. Lamb,

    The name belies your basic nature. You are more like Aesop’s fox, hiding behind bravado and bull. No one else has hidden themselves, but have been open concerning who they are and what they represent. When you reach the same level of openness and integrity, I might listen to what you say. Yes, it is personal, as opposed to the impersonal, unidentified position you occupy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s